Is body recomposition possible?
Several studies have compared being in a calorie surplus versus being at maintenance while resistance training.
Several studies have compared being in a calorie surplus versus being at maintenance while resistance training. The post Is body recomposition possible? appeared first on Stronger by Science. Body recomposition – gaining muscle while losing fat – is one of the most desirable outcomes in fitness. In reality, the notion that you can get leaner and more muscular at the same time sounds almost too good to be true. Once you’ve been training for a few years, the argument goes, you supposedly must pick a lane: cut or bulk. However, the research shows that the story isn’t quite that simple. Generally, being in a surplus produces similar or slightly greater gains in muscle size. The rationale is intuitive: extra energy could facilitate recovery, speed glycogen replenishment, and let you train harder or with higher volume – all of which should support hypertrophy. A meta-regression of 52 training studies found that being in a deficit clearly reduced muscle gain, but most participants training around maintenance still increased lean mass. In fact, across hundreds of resistance-training studies, participants are rarely told how much to eat; they simply train while maintaining their usual diet. Bodyweight typically stays stable, yet those same studies almost always report increased muscle size and reduced fat mass simultaneously. A calorie surplus might slightly improve outcomes in some cases, but it’s clear that recomposition can and does occur under maintenance conditions. One common misconception is that the building process of gaining muscle consumes a ton of energy. In reality, the metabolic cost of building skeletal muscle mass is around 12.7 to 19.5 kJ per gram of muscle mass. This equates to around 3-4.6 kcal per gram of muscle mass. Given these figures, the energetic cost of depositing muscle mass would be relatively small. In fact, the muscle-building process requires an extra 9 to 27 kcal per day. This can almost certainly be met endogenously by mobilizing stored energy from glycogen or adipose tissue. In short, synthesizing new muscle tissue doesn’t require a measurable surplus on a day-to-day basis. It’s more accurate to view body recomposition as a continuum of energy balance. Being in a deficit maximizes fat loss, but tends to limit or slightly reverse hypertrophy. Eating at maintenance allows moderate fat loss and moderate muscle gain simultaneously. Shooting for a surplus maximizes hypertrophy, but at the cost of some fat gain. Where you fall on this continuum depends on your training quality, recovery, and current body composition. However, there are caveats to note – training status may or may not matter, and most studies in this area involve relatively untrained or intermediate lifters. As you get more advanced, the total rate of muscle gain slows dramatically, making recomposition slower.